Synopsis
Do-seong (Yoo Min) is a child monk who lives at a small mountain temple with the head monk (Byeon Ki-jong), learning the teachings of Buddha. He becomes attached to a young widow (Choi Eun-hee) who comes to pray at the temple, and the childless widow entreats the head monk to let her raise Do-seong as her own son. Conflict ensues when Do-seong's real mother (Kim Seon-young) appears, but she leaves the temple for the sake of her son's future. On the day the widow is to take the child down from the mountain, the head monk discovers that Do-seong has killed a bird by ensnaringit in a trap and decides not to let the boy go into the secular world. When Do-seong finds out that his real mother has been to the temple, he sets out to find her.
Notes
"A film that has garnered recognition for its cinematography and direction by eliminating sentimentality and unaffectedly capturing the quiet life of a mountain temple. A Hometown in Heart demonstrates the camera technique and directorial skill of movies that appeared after the liberation of Korea."
A Hometown in Heart, adapted from playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung), was hailed upon its release as "a masterpiece that marked a new pinnacle in Korean moviemaking after the liberation." Eschewing new-school sentimentality to quietly express a boy's longing for maternal love, the film unfolds the everyday lives of three generationsthe head monk, a young monk, and a little child monkagainst the backdrop of a quiet temple in the mountains. The long shots utilized by director of cinematography Han Hyung-mo to capture the beautiful scenery of the mountain temple from a distance received great critical acclaim at the time. Also, each of the film's characters is convincingly portrayed through the skillful direction of Yoon Yong-kyu. In particular, the scene which expresses Do-seong's desperate yearning for a mother's love and his birth mother's past visit to the temple by combining them into a dream sequence reveals deep consideration for articulating story and emotion via a compressed visual grammar without tending toward sentimentalism. The movie's final scene, in which Do-seong awakens from his dream and sets off down the path in search of his mother, is both touching and beautiful. The film also features Choi Eun-hee, in the part of the young widow who warmly embraces Do-seong with her love, in one of her first roles.
Afterword:
- Lee Kang-su, writing under the pseudonym of Kwak Il-byeong, first adapted playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung) into a screenplay, which was then shot for the silver screen with additional embellishments by the director.
画面和音乐超美。故事上，氛围烘托不错，但作为悬疑片，几乎从电影的三分之一处就完全猜到结尾，尤其给手帕的特写实在太过刻意。而且最后的揭秘除了没有惊喜感，对于逻辑推理的演绎也实在是有些过于简单。比如说指出是表哥去撬开了神庙大石头，hello？请问男主角是有天眼吗？表哥居然还当场就认了，实在是有些侮辱观众。
第一个故事最精彩，让我想到了树海村；第二个故事还不错，最后的站立直给反而有点弱化恐怖程度，不如鬼入侵的同款场景；第三个故事完全就是第一人称游戏，只是这些人都是被迫绑来做实验，否则这个科学家不正是赛博朋克世界重要的医务人员？第四个故事恐怖的不在于怪物，而是这群人。广告部分也很经典，是金广发没错了。我还在纳闷这个无用的机器能卖这么贵？最后主线串场故事就是搞笑的。
新版与时俱进地在挨个排查时加了同性恋和种族歧视议题，奈何仍然全员酱油。艾米汉莫演得太差，假到连我这个没看过原著和老版的人不用推理就能猜到凶手，能让这种表演通过，导演难辞其咎，嚯忘了导演是比波洛更自恋的人了，他才不关心别人的存在感呢。
震惊，blm口号已经被编剧用歪了：黑人非但不能是反派，更不能是死者。
救命，太可怕了，让人当场取消alist再也不想为了薅羊毛强行去电影院。颜值萎败（+演员本人debuff）的阿米锤演这么个莫名自带性瘾魔咒的男狐狸精谁吃得下呢，所有完全不性感的公共场合play都使我满脑乱ring“why dont we do it in the road”来缓解恶心感；金字塔特效过时得我全程惦记没打完的刺客起源，镜头和光影和剪辑全部业余得令人叹服。剧本做了一些干瘪死板的耸动改编，点缀了零零星星的white supremacy凝视和说教，头尾拧成了徒劳自恋的波洛故事尴尬补完。（以及我实在不想再听英国演员凹法语口音了，jane birkin也就算了，这么多年过去了何必何必）
改编成了一个“爱男人不得善终，搞拉拉才能活命”的故事。
能把阿婆的故事拍稀碎，也是一种反向的超能力，我觉得没吃晚饭冒着冷风花着钱跑去看它的我才是惨案本身。
真希望有高人能教教肯尼思·布拉纳怎么拍电影。
故事就那么回事吧，能猜到凶手没猜到手法。推理部分有点弱，布拉纳应该多做下前半段的剧场感。这一版波洛还挺人性的，有意思，布拉纳演的也还行，就是拍的一般。btw把埃及拍太美了吧！想去
参加蜜月旅行的一群人，上坟的衣服倒是没少带，导演用心了。
拍得是nmlgb。同性恋、黑人加入，拍得稀烂
首先震惊一刀未剪
前面加那么多铺垫干嘛，而且结局能不能不要那么好猜。还有，背景真的好假。
真诚希望Kenneth Branagh可以别再演波洛了，也希望他别再导电影了…我承认可能是我对他有很大偏见，从去年贝尔法斯特到这个我真的蛮无语的。他的野心真的很大，他的导演作品和演技都给我一种在不停炫技的感觉，有一种强大的自恋型人格笼罩着这部电影，可能真的只是我个人偏见吧，但是我真的不是很喜欢，真的太难受了，以及那个胡子，我的天啊，真的要命！！！
前面的爱情元素太多了，后面悬疑氛围没到位，结尾真相来的有点唐突，缺一点递进，把埃及拍的很美。
3.5吧，冲着这部比之前的东方快车要好一些，偏4星吧还是。这片子我是骂骂咧咧地等着上映，但作为阿加莎的书粉，哪儿有翻拍哪儿就有我。这个版本集合了我不太喜欢的点，比如每个镜头都太刻意仪式感，比如开头结尾的两段剧情太多余让波罗直接OOC了，比如强行加了好几条感情线。不过剧情嘛也还好，死者换了一个，但改编得还可以忍受，画面是很美的，很恢宏很强色彩，不过阿布辛贝勒神庙那场的石头太假了。总体来说，现代翻拍太注重画面了，悬疑感一般，但没看过原著的可看。
前面的爱情元素太多了，后面悬疑氛围没到位，结尾真相来的有点唐突，缺一点递进，把埃及拍的很美。
摄影真的棒，但前面铺垫也真的好无聊！一战揭秘男主身世那段虽然不算长，但也是拖节奏的。凶手是真的没惊喜（因为其他人比起这俩动机真的弱爆了），而且布克中枪后，汉莫完全没有下意识躲避怕伤到自己，其实这里已经暴露的很明显了。来豆瓣写短评的时候才发现女二原来不是玛格特罗比啊，你俩也太像了！导演能力确实有限，对《贝尔法斯特》更加不期待了。
第一次看恐怖片这么好笑，除了画面很cult外剧情好迷惑
阿加莎的小说改编成电影都评分很低啊，不知道是对原著期待太高不满浓缩的剧情还是真的就觉得阿婆的推理小说不行。。反正我看的还挺起劲儿的，一个人在影院包场看的，啊～周一的早上除了我还有谁去影院看电影呢，哈哈哈，而且从家到影院只需要3分钟，只是可惜影院一般，灯太亮了= =！【喜欢里面妈妈画的埃及金字塔放风筝的人～而且她也是全片的“人间清醒”，爱情就是那么回事咯，残念～
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
