Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
3.6分。
当机器人开始发问，一切都不一样了。惨兮兮中一点温暖吧。如果芬奇早出发，或许在旧金山好好生活。毕竟能农耕了，人也是生产资料，恶意会少很多。
设定和场景真的太fallout了吧！另外，是因为苹果投资的所以加州还没事？
类似机器管家的题材，未来一片萧然悲观景象，故事线很弱，但汉克斯的表现基本拿住了整部戏。片头片尾贯穿的American pie赛高。
童话故事了，不需要和其他人类拼命的废土科幻能有什么意思。但公路旅行永远浪漫的，世界末日也要压着双黄线一路向西，再忙也记得给自己搞件大衣。
平淡平缓，没有剧烈的戏剧冲突感，就连短暂出现的反派都没有露脸。很难说它是末日版的《荒岛余生》还是温情版《我是传奇》，披着科幻末世外衣的公路片，基本上看到中间就知道结局如何了。与其说是电影，更像是加长版的短片。温情脉脉，娓娓道来
天，后劲太大了！出不去难道是因为我是养狗人士吗，仅此而已吗
ps：看到一半了才认出来这大胡子是汤姆汉克斯😅脸盲没救了属于是😅
死前教机器人养狗。故事拍的太长了，没有看着AI一起成长的那种感觉，略显无聊吧。
科幻的外壳家庭的主题，没有特别复杂的情节和人物关系，但余味很长。除了汉克斯很强的独角戏外，都是日常家庭可见可触摸的感受，机器人也相当于人生中的父子关系。但关系处理很细致到位，和看日本的家庭电影一样的感受，其实是有相通之处
蝴蝶飞舞 jeff胸口的开罐器
开局一条狗，世界任我走！
虽然是披着末日科幻外皮的公路片，但汤姆汉克斯这种类型演员的片还是觉得看一部少一部。1080P 21/11/05
末世题材。给狗狗做了个机器人 还配了个开罐头的零件 机器人从没名字到慢慢有了自我意识 狗狗慢慢接受了Jeff 一切都好温暖 最后一机一狗还真有画面。
一场旅行，因为有汉克斯大叔在，变的有情有意思。
是一个让人平静的片子，但是套路卡得都太死了，真不是苹果公司拿大数据和人工智能搞出来的剧本吗？把精华拿出来作为《爱死机》一集估计能拿四星。
除了短暂的回忆场景中的人物，以及未见其人的第二辆车，以及狗和蝴蝶，全片其实只有一个传统意义上的演员。
Ai拥有人性，那里让人热泪盈眶人性指的是真善美爱与信任，而不是大开杀戒，尔虞我诈。一人一狗一啰嗦的零件，都能让人眼眶酸滞。
只用了四天，一个具有感情、能做梦的机器人竟然真的长大了，地球生命在浩劫之后成功进入新纪元
前阿甘教導阿甘機器人哈哈哈哈，stopping，initiative!後面口音倒是越來越自然了。finch是怎麼遭到輻射的？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
