A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
高光：接吻脑后长出的彩虹思维导图，最后大战的美队和光剑。
出乎意料的好看😄太喜欢这种AI觉醒的设定了，配上游戏的背景太有趣了！啾迪太帅了！！！
PS：钱老板背地里肯定玩很大哦，好喜欢
游戏中的世界和现实何等相似……盖原来是程序员写给心爱女孩子的一封情书，结尾被感动了。
非常合格的爆米花电影，看得很欢乐~游戏与现实世界的交错设定有趣，版权大户迪士尼爸爸，彩蛋不要太多…结尾那个绝对爆笑！程序员的情书都写在代码里❤️
最近最戳我的一部，GTA还是输给了The Sims…没想到再一次看到美队是在这里。真爱之吻和解放自由永远有效，程序员浪漫起来简直不是人…贱贱好帅～（吐槽一下，每次在外国电影里关于中国的画面能不能不要这么脏乱差…改变一下刻板印象吧…）最后，保护版权，人人有责。
键盘对米莉的表白简直秀我一脸，浪漫得要死要死的不要不要的。。即使伊始已然暗示过，却丝毫不影响影片最后的浪漫表白，合理铺垫且恰到好处火候正佳。
跳票了一年多，终于上映了，总算质量很高。有笑点有泪点，还让我想起了很多初玩游戏时的傻劲，彩蛋更不必说了，恰到好处——埃文斯嘬了口咖啡，“what **？”
你们make out的时候能不能不要站在马路中间啊啊啊
后半段剧情一整个大崩盘，但是该笑的地方还是狠狠笑了，确实很有趣，是不错的爆米花片，但是笑完发现自己好像也就是这个世界的NPC，谁泪目了。7.4
只要故事不是太烂，将诸多的经典IP汇集于一部大电影中已成为一种稳妥的玩法；叫座又叫好，情怀还可以续一波，爽。版权在手，天下我有，大佬带你装逼带你飞。配乐很赞。《黑客帝国》、《终结者》、《异形》的警示是获得自主意识的计算机、互联网、机器人、人工智能的“革命”对于人类未来的威胁，本片在超炫酷娱乐性掩盖之下的则是目前无孔不入的电子游戏与人工智能（当然，还有其他的影射），而《人猿星球》及《猩球崛起》则是另一种方式的“革命”。
还挺好看的，就，对人工智能的理解某种程度上也到位，哈哈哈，虽然对我来说看下来还是有尬点
在简单的主线上插满梗的爆米花喜剧，没有预期的GTA感。背景在那，却没有得到充分的发挥。内核没有深挖，主题肤浅，还是美国佬那套自由。模板化强，缺乏惊喜。节奏控制稀烂。整体一般。
Hers风格一转，80年代的柔光，夜电台，开头有滑入梦幻的危险。随后用Talulah证明印象式笔触的必要性，脸庞高悬心内，夜之花照耀巴黎。结尾在记忆中溯回，迫切地抓住一瞬，肉身同在多可贵。
爱你，就为你制作专属于你的游戏。谁说NPC不可以有感情，游戏和现实的双向治愈，温暖人心。2021年好莱坞大片观影体验极佳，虽然我家电影院这放映中间出了点状况。总是在想，中国什么时候也可以拍出这样炫酷又幽默风趣的大片啊？最后还抖了一下漫威的梗，影迷们心照不宣。雷诺兹演技真的顶，赶在影院开门第一天跑来看，值了!
还蛮喜欢这个故事的，从NPC爱上玩家，到NPC全部消失，唯一的问题就是，从真爱之吻开始，就变得太假了，编得太美好了，不过不管怎样，那个保安是个英雄。
7/10
看下来也没当时宣传的那么好嘛，也就70分的样子。论彩蛋，无论如何也敌不过《头号玩家》。希望类似的玩家系列不要像XX总动员那样泛滥，毕竟挖彩蛋这种事，做个一两次也就够了，再多就烂。| I'm a love letter for you.
2.5/标准商业片毫无惊喜，剧情完全被猜到，如果整部电影能做到最后十分钟漫天撒彩蛋致敬的水准，那就及格了。可惜，还是过于简单/带我爸一起看的，看完他问，为什么不先断电再砸服务器呢 - -/旁边的小情侣男女主一kiss就开始亲，隔空互动一百分
故事的内核无非是要活出自己人生那一套，无论是NPC或是小角色。“皮儿”相对新颖很多，人工智能自我意识，枪战、爆炸各式特效轮番轰炸足够精彩，主题也没有升华成《楚门的世界》《西部世界》那样，点到即止，特别适合打工人们需要放松的周末。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
