Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
从一众假喜剧片里算是“脱颖而出”，能卖到快30亿只能说明喜剧真的是刚需。
缝合大杂烩，迷影梗乱炖，全是无聊的笑点堆砌毫无感情，没有丁点属于本土的价值思考和改编创意。
合家欢看的话尴尬但还能笑。主角实在太适合周星驰了。“麦克，我要为亚瑟摩根复仇！”这句是玩的《荒野大镖客》吗？🤨
没有看出是现实剧情+戏，只觉得是戏外戏+戏，所有场景都跟彩排一样闹腾! 小品拼接起来的喜剧电影不是个人喜欢的喜剧类型，不推荐!PS:请问开心麻花就马丽一个女的吗？
前半部是真的很好笑，男主对笑点的释放演的很好，值得一看，后半部没劲，玩着手机边听边看就行了。整体完成度算是可以。
一个适合串联段子的剧情结构，加上圆老师标准神经病的演技，一个合格的组合，架空的背景也不会让人太较真。段子都是拷贝的，惊喜还属预告片密集。
即便结尾转成电影拍摄场景也依旧掩盖不了小品式的表演与拍摄风格，但即便如此，在小品日渐拉垮的春节档能带来不尴尬的欢笑已经实属不易了。
5.5/10
跟日本原版相比，加了很多适合本土低笑点观众的梗，也适度的改编了结局，挺适合春节合家欢看个热闹的。
魏翔的表演与人物相得益彰。其他人也没有那么油了。
意大利突突那里，一个子弹都没有伤人是不是太鬼扯了。这部电影看着别扭的问题就在于黑帮的真，非常不真，无论是艾伦的真杀手，或者是陈明昊的真老大，都太喜剧演员了。本来由真实世界与虚拟表演之间形成的对冲，就完全没力度了。马丽本来我也喜欢的，但，实在不适合这个昔日大美人的角色。两星全部给我从好多年前看麻花时就喜欢的魏翔，花絮那里哭着说是第一个男主角是全电影最动人之处。
挺羡慕的，能找到资源、人脉，完成一次感动自己的作品，尤其是发生在一个从各方面看起来都平平无奇的大叔身上，票房啥的不重要了。马丽的塑料表演真的真的真的特别特别特别不适合大银幕，甚至配不上这种草台电影，换一个人演，可能会好很多。
有意思，魏翔真是戏里戏外合一了。龙套的确不容易，希望每个人都有自己的出彩时刻吧。
从教父到雨中曲，从大镖客到周润发
博特曼没了消息，桑谢斯被大巴黎超车，夺冠一个月了管理层新的内斗剧本还没结束。真该把这电影抄送给新老板。伤害米兰，马尔蒂尼拿大炮轰来我真捂不住！
~多有意思的片子啊，魏翔个人毁容式、全方位式、全投入式演出，尤其“你敢耍我”那段，有被震撼到，好演员啊。。。
服化道看着就是五毛特效，话剧经费标准。笑点倒也是有，十分生硬，比那几部冒名开心麻花那种随时尬的抠出三室一厅要强，但是比之前几部作品，留不下什么金句和让人印象深刻的片段。
劝那些觉得无逻辑的朋友放轻松些吧，这无厘头风格的确是非常成功的贺岁档啊，开心麻花把小品变成电影，功底了得，也是对不争气的春晚亏欠做了一个弥补。劝大家都多看看喜剧吧，尤其是在这样的一个即便晴天很多，但一直笼罩在“阴天”下的四月。PS两个插曲以及魏翔最后的彩蛋运用蛮好的，很触动。
男主一会有点像左小祖咒一会又点像我昇，总会来说麻花继续给人一种QJ电影的想吐感。票价10蚊的周三晚八点黄金场@佛老汇
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
