Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
观影体验还不错，氛围营造很足，作为商业片值得两小时。不过最后结局反转的价值观传达很不当代
可能人需要走出舒适区才能发现自己还是需要待在舒适区里。这部电影埃导做了很多不一样的尝试，放弃了很多自己的特点，结果变得平平无奇。以及男导演塑造女性角色能写好得确实不多，都要靠配角衬托，还有很多想当然的东西。很想告诉埃导，不会拍女的就别拍了，跟胖胖瘦瘦一起玩不好吗？
前面气氛、节奏、质感做得多好啊，后面莫名为嫖客漂洗，就不伦不类了
有失水准。故事架构，服化道，演员都没有大问题，镜头也好看。可一个反向开膛手故事，怎么能讲得如此空洞啊，埃导是不是也不会写女人，嗨呀。
华美、糜烂与黑暗，风格化的叙事佐以复古音乐不要太迷人。
我非常喜欢托马辛麦肯齐和安雅泰勒，能看到这两个人出现在一部电影里我还是很激动的，但这一点依然不足够让我给这部电影打四星，前几天我还非常认真得像喜欢的女孩介绍了血与冰淇淋三部曲，并且和她一起重新看了《僵尸肖恩》，介绍了一些埃德加赖特的特点，我对这部电影本来有更高的期待，辛亏我当时没说一起看埃德加赖特的新片
最不喜剧的一部莱特，也是最不喜欢的一部莱特。剪辑、摄影、表现手法在线甚至有所突破，依旧难掩剧本和人物的稀碎。所以观感十分分裂，俗套又新颖，说是爆米花商业吧，又不如 babydriver 要素多。虽然很爱莱特，但他真的驾驭不了「大作」。
好漂亮的转场！好厉害的调度！好牛逼的审美！喜欢！
缺点演员演技真的烂 导致人物扁平化 不太能代入情绪 为了政治正确强行搞个伟光正的黑人男友真的呵呵了 跟影片风格特别不搭 关键是你找个帅点的也行了 这个真的一言难尽
快两年以后第一次回电影院LOL，上次也是看了个英国电影。这片和看过的这个导演的以往作品一样，视觉上很炫，很会选音乐。但是这部剧情比较简单，看完了以后会觉得这么简单一个故事线是怎么撑到快两个小时的。Moral of the story: 60s isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Otherwise why didn’t everyone stay there lol.
已经是十年前的歪小子了
心猿意马，旨趣相拆。结局设计可厌近于可怖。
看的很舒服。虽然说埃德加赖特标志性的剪辑风格和黑色幽默完全没在此片展现，但是片中靠音乐和镜像制造的转场足够扳回一成，人物和空间的转换都很流畅，尤其是那场双人舞戏的调度足见功力，两个女演员的发挥都很出色，霓虹风格加金曲串烧也保证了视听上的双重享受，但是影片的文本的确是减分项，靠镜子投射营造出来的悬疑感在向恐怖片转换后逐渐弱化，反转的支撑力也不够，大团圆的这个结局设计也让本来突出的女性悲剧减了分，有点可惜。（8/10）
惊悚，恐怖，血浆，尖刀，60s的复古回潮，一梦醒间，恍惚，迷蒙。
居然是年度最佳（女性&惊悚）！我靠，埃德加奈特生涯最佳，没想到大家喜欢的西蒙佩奇反而是埃德加莱特的拖油瓶。整部剧感觉非常的浪漫，且很会讲故事，开篇的感觉直追《守望者》。我要颁给赖特最佳导演奖，剧本奖，摄影奖和音乐奖。
#加州行观影系列#3.12旧金山飞新加坡机上看的。爱德加赖特是不是不太适合拍惊悚片，故事本身就挺空洞了，有加上这故弄玄虚的各种技法，literally很穿越。最差的是结尾，我很费解：她住了这么久都不知道房东姓甚名谁？？明明喝了毒药，挣扎两下之后就又跟没事人一样，又是打斗又是逃跑的……？
2. 鸡肋的编剧真的打在脸上侮辱我智商；
看的时候我一直在想让日本人来怎么拍，一个昭和和当代的对话，不论是往癫狂过火拍，还是往端庄优雅拍，还是往解构KUSO拍，都有不少人能拍的比这有意思。
『用迷幻的裙装掩盖糜烂的正装』女主学服装设计的，背景也在伦敦... 你要说是《黑白魔女库伊拉》我都信，只不过比迪士尼黑一点点罢了...内核呢就像《前途似“镜”的女孩》+《镜中人》|顺便其中被人津津乐道的“丧尸？” 我觉得更像是那个都市传说《瘦长鬼影》 Slender Man 怪物形象
角色的动机很奇怪，甚至几乎没有铺垫。最后的真相的反转反而把前面堆砌营造的氛围破坏了一大半。John的角色似乎对剧情没有太大的作用，校园霸凌的戏份挺无趣。优点是视听语言太精致了，整个迷幻地沉浸在了60年代复古梦里。最喜欢的应该是女主那段追逐戏和梯子上的对手戏了。不过本身对这部的期待就不高，所以没有惊喜也没有失望，3星刚好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
