Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
铁道兵是和平时期牺牲最多的军人，即使脱下军装，仍然以军人的标准严格要求自己。铁道兵集体转业后成立的中国铁建，是新时代中国高铁的建设者，见证了中国高铁从无到有，直到世界第一。截止2020年底，随着银西高铁的建成，中国高铁总里程达到3.8万公里，占世界高铁总运营里程的近70%。
“在灾难面前，西方人的传说是诺亚方舟，我们祖先的故事是精卫填海，愚公移山。”
为英雄的铁道兵，为强悍且专业的中国基建狂魔，多给一星。徒手雨中攀负角度悬崖，太夸张了，设备包不丢反而真实。
单纯给立意和演员打个三星吧。
但是不妨碍我喜欢这种全员脏兮兮的电影，主题角色都有可圈可点的地方，比起画着一丝不苟妆容，梳着帅气发型，高磨皮滤镜显得专业得多，希望能鼓励电影界多拍类似的作品，越做越好
后面有些逻辑bug，但电影传达的精神都传达了
别的都还好，就……恶劣的大暴雨天气徒手攀岩悬崖峭壁+悬崖一跃精准攀搭上直升机……就……
尽管特效有点假，剧情上也有比较尬的地方，但这个题材还是比较新颖。铁道兵是和平年代国家牺牲最多的部队，向他们致敬！
中规中矩吧，剧情还是太薄弱了，画面转换蛮生硬的，特效也挺一言难尽，亮点可能就在于最后致敬铁道兵吧。
《峰爆》，肉眼可见的制作水平，浓厚感人的情感力量绝对值得票价。这样的一套东方式灾难片叙事，集体救灾的模式，或许会为中国的灾难片指了一条明路。全员演技在线。
恐高症看着脚软同时有点震撼，感情戏有点感动又有点尴尬。居老师一如既往的帅气，焦艳俊永远是我心里的小秋。
有一说一 剧本结构还是不错的 和国外灾难片打一打都没问题 但是这表演实在是太做作了 在个人英雄主义和集体主义之间徘徊 就很难有动人之处
但是，有些地方（我也说不出是哪）给人的感觉，其实还行，不较真的情况下，就那种感觉（是有点灾难片的味道），在这几年的国产主旋律片里矮个拔高个，起码能看下去哈哈哈。（也有可能是因为我二倍速）
中规中矩 大场面的特效看着非常韩国灾难片 果然俩视效总监都是韩国人
作为一个从小在铁路单位大院长大的孩子，对铁路总有特别的情节，向那些前辈致敬。
很好的电影，我们的国家坚持生命至上，人民至上，不会为了经济利益放弃人民，我的人民也爱护国家，不惜用自己的生命去拯救更多人的生命。
看过电影后印象比较深的就是主角爸爸为了能让主角登上山间平台奉献了自己的生命，展现了老兵精神。现实生活中我们的铁道兵也是这样，为了修建一条隧道，奉献了自己的大半生。但是剧中的徒手攀岩确实有点离谱。总的来说还是值得一看！
看完觉得特别惊喜，剧情流畅自然，感情戏细腻，好像这个故事还是有人物原型的，中国人自己的灾难片，自己的故事总是有一种特别的感动在里面
（灾难片不要煽情，珍惜时间、尊重常识是最好的，千万不要刻意编造不实在的情节给予太耀目的主角光环）
有很多剧情、人设、常识、特效上的硬伤
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
