A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
这是一群披着人皮的禽兽，西装革履、满脸正义同时又张着血盆大口正在舔舐双手上的鲜血，讨论如何符合法律、道德、信仰，系统化、高效化、程序化的实施那该死的种族灭绝政策。由此可见，纳粹分子干着最肮脏的交易还要为它盖上一层遮羞布，德三的法律、道德、信仰才是整个人类社会的退步！
严谨又优雅地讨论着恐怖程序，1100万生命15人花两小时决定，跨部门区域合作的效率巅峰。杀小孩是帮助了反正都没了父母的他们，有混血血统的做绝育免伤家人感情，动态清零
从内部打开的视角很新颖，但在剧作和影像上似乎没有让人眼前一亮的东西。
仿佛是纪录片，结合了纪录片的写实，但比纪录片更好，将那份历经坎坷重见天日的《万湖会议纪要》以活生生的样子体现出来
人的命，有时候真不如猪，都快一百年了，咋还是这个样呢
轴心说“轴心”是轴心
同样也需要愿意写作并且生活的艺术家们。
纯爱战神❤️
会议上各部门的头头为了自身利益相互博弈，会议召集者为了达到目的软硬兼施。与会者在一番讨价还价，让利得利之后，终于达成一致。
一间屋，一张桌，一群人的杀人计划。这些德国人真的严谨得可怕。数据分析得精密，方案考虑得周全，还处处为成本着想，非常有条理。而这些严谨，用在大屠杀上，是无法言语的恐怖。
非常密集的台词，以至于刚开始十五分钟不停的在倒回重看。非常“高效”的一场会议，充分体现出德国人的严谨，把1100万犹太人安排的明明白白，看的人毛骨悚然。
看现在死宅一脸兴奋冲出电影院说“好好看我喜欢”的时候甚至会感觉现在的小孩有点可怜……吃制作精良的垃圾吃久了，连正常的饭是什么味道就忘记了。环境变成这样 你我都有罪。两星给mappa至少打戏画面花钱下功夫认真做了。
德国人精细严谨的特点被表现得很好
生活在2022 回看80年前 恐怖依然存在于我们身边
这是一群披着人皮的禽兽，西装革履、满脸正义同时又张着血盆大口正在舔舐双手上的鲜血，讨论如何符合法律、道德、信仰，系统化、高效化、程序化的实施那该死的种族灭绝政策。由此可见，纳粹分子干着最肮脏的交易还要为它盖上一层遮羞布，德三的法律、道德、信仰才是整个人类社会的退步！
这个题材比庭审还要难拍，开会的戏演绎的如此优秀。人物鲜明 大量对话很精彩 各方利益的博弈淋漓尽致。最终方案抛出来就是毒气。
“纳粹”说纳粹是“纳粹”
一场会议因为议定了残忍的方案而臭名昭著。会议上的人员政见不同、派别不同、思路不同，但最终都主动地或非主动地达成了对犹太人处置的共识。只是因为参会人员众多、以及对他们的身份不熟悉，因此对他们所说的所做的还不是很清晰地了解，需要二刷三刷才行。但就一次会议而言，因为会议内容吸引人，所以拍出来还是有人喜欢看的。
作为动画片还是不错的，打斗，插曲都很棒，中规中矩是中二鬼怪日漫，作为电影在大荧幕，略弱。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
